Open Space Element Table of Contents
LIST OF FIGURES
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
State law recognizes that open space land is a limited and valuable resource
which must be conserved wherever possible. The element must address open
space for the preservation of natural resources, for the managed production
of resources, for outdoor recreation, and for public health and safety.
The purpose of the Open Space Element is to preserve the natural and
scenic resources which contribute to the general welfare and quality of
life for the residents of the county and to the maintenance of its tourism
industry. This element provides the guidelines for making necessary consistency
findings and includes an implementation program, as required by law.
1.2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS
The Open Space Element is coordinated with the Public Safety, Public
Facilities, Agricultural Resources and Resource Conservation Elements.
Figure OS-1 on page 107 illustrates the relationship
between these elements. The Land Use element reinforces the policies of
this element and is consistent with the preservation of open space lands.
1.3 SCOPE AND ORGANIZATION
The Open Space Element has three major components, a policy framework
for the preservation of open space lands, an open space map for each planning
area identifying lands subject to the various policies, and an implementation
program.
There are four classifications of open space - scenic resources, biotic
resources, outdoor recreation, and rchaeological/historical resources.
2.0 SCENIC RESOURCES
The unique quality of Sonoma County results from the attractiveness and
diversity of its landscape. The scenic resources component includes three
open space categories, community separators, scenic landscape units, and
scenic highway corridors. Figure OS-2 on page 169
shows these scenic resource areas.
2.1 POLICY FOR COMMUNITY SEPARATORS
A characteristic which distinguishes Sonoma County from many parts of
the San Francisco Bay Area is the continued existence of separate, identifiable
cities and communities. Some land areas need to remain open or retain
a rural character in order to avoid corridor-style urbanization. These
lands may not necessarily be highly scenic in their own right, but provide
visual relief from continuous urbanization and are a special type of scenic
border -- a community separator. They are frequently subject to pressure
for development because they are close to developed areas and major roads.
Many property owners are concerned that open space policies may affect
their property values.
The following eight areas have been identified as community separators:
| 1) |
Petaluma/Novato. Approximately 2755 acres are designated
to retain open space between Petaluma and the Marin County line. Dominant
features include rolling hills with trees and farms located along
the valley floor. Additional commercial development would detract
from this rural atmosphere. This community separator is bounded on
the north by the Petaluma Urban Service Boundary as shown in Figure
LU-5h of the Land Use Element, on the east by NWPRR rail right-of-way,
on the south by the Sonoma/Marin County line, and on the west by the
existing community separator boundary as shown in Figure OS-5h of
the Open Space Element from the Sonoma/Marin County line to the northerly
boundary of APN 019-260-001, then westerly to I Street, then northerly
to the Petaluma Urban Service Boundary, but excluding any lands currently
designated as Commercial in Figure LU-5h. |
| 2) |
Petaluma/Rohnert Park. This separator between Petaluma, Penngrove
and Rohnert Park/Cotati includes Liberty Valley, one of the outstanding
views in the county. Development on existing rural residential lots
would be intrusive unless properly sited and screened. About 3360
acres have been designated within this separator. |
| 3) |
Rohnert Park/Santa Rosa. Approximately 1700 acres between
Rohnert Park and Santa Rosa are designated in order to retain an open
space break between these cities. Large parcels along Stony Point
Road and Petaluma Hill Road create relief from the urban area and
provide views of fields and hills. Rural development now limits the
visual separation, but urban development along this corridor would
block views of the mountains and create a more intense urban form.
Planting around any new structures would help maintain the rural character. |
| 4) |
Santa Rosa/Sebastopol. While some "strip development" exists
along the Highway 12 corridor between Santa Rosa and Sebastopol, scenic
views of the Laguna de Santa Rosa, oak studded pastures and Mt. St.
Helena are available. Approximately 1400 acres are designated to maintain
the visual separation between these cities. Retention of the existing
oak woodlands and riparian vegetation is critical to the scenic value
of this area. |
| 5) |
Windsor/Larkfield/Santa Rosa. This 2000 acre separator provides
an open space break along the Highway 101 and Old Redwood Highway
corridors between Santa Rosa, Larkfield-Wikiup, and Windsor. Significant
views are available to the west across fields and vineyards to the
Mendocino Highlands and to the east over the Mark West Springs Hills
to Mt. St. Helena. Development in the area may significantly reduce
rural quality. |
| 6) |
Windsor/Healdsburg. Approximately 1200 acres along the Highway
101 corridor would be retained as open space to prevent Windsor and
Healdsburg from merging. Screening of future development in the rolling
hills to the east of the freeway would maintain scenic quality in
this area. |
| 7) |
Northeast Santa Rosa. This 3500 acre separator extends along
Highway 12 near the Oakmont community and follows the ridgeline above
Rincon Valley northwest of Calistoga Road. Included in this area are
scattered rural residential development and open oak woodlands. Urban
encroachment in the hillside areas and valley floor would detract
from the visual quality. |
| 8) |
Glen Ellen/Agua Caliente. Approximately 1400 acres between
Glen Ellen and Agua Caliente/Boyes Hot Springs are designated to separate
these urban areas. Highway 12, extending through the Valley of the
Moon, provides expansive views of the Sonoma-Napa mountains and vineyard
covered hillsides. Intense development along the valley floor and
mountainsides would lessen the scenic quality in this area. |
Past County policy for these separator lands has varied. In some areas,
development rights on a portion of some sites were given in return for
open space easements on the remainder. Elsewhere, development has been
approved on individual parcels. Uniform standards for each community separator
would define the types and intensity of uses which are desired to retain
these lands in an open manner with very low intensity of development.
Goal OS-1 Preserve the visual identities of communities by maintaining
open space areas between cities and communities.
Objective OS-1.1: Preserve important open space areas in the community
separators shown on Figures OS-5a through OS-5i of the Open Space Element.
Objective OS-1.2: Retain a rural character and promote low intensities
of development in community separators. Avoid their annexation or inclusion
in spheres of influence for sewer and water service providers.
Objective OS-1.3: Provide opportunities for consideration of additional
development in community separators in exchange for permanent open space
preservation and other overriding public benefits.
Objective OS-1.4: Preserve existing specimen trees and tree stands
within community separator areas.
Figure OS-1
Open Space for
PRESERVATION OF
NATURAL
RESOURCES
|
Land-Use Element |
Natural Resource Conservation Areas |
| Other Policies |
| Resource Conservation Element |
Groundwater Recharge Area |
| Rare or Endangered Species |
| Other Policies |
| Open Space Element |
Biotic Resource Conservation Areas |
| Protected Natural Riparian Areas |
| Modified Natural Riparian Areas |
| Other Policies |
| |
Open Space for
MANAGED
PRODUCTION
OF RESOURCES
|
Land-Use Element |
Agricultural Use Categories (3) |
| Timberland Areas |
| Geothermal and Mineral resource Areas |
| Resource Conservation Element |
Groundwater Availability Classifications |
Other Policies: Soil, Water, Fishery
Geothermal, Mineral Resources |
| Agricultural Resources Element |
Other Policies: Agricultural Production Areas |
| |
Open Space for
OUTDOOR
RECREATION |
Public Facilities Element |
Public Parks |
| Other Policies: Parklands |
| Open Space Element |
Parks |
| Trails: Equestrian, Hiking, Waterways |
| Bikeways |
Scenic Resources: Community Separators,
Scenic Landscape Units, Scenic Highways |
| Land Use Element |
Other Policies |
| |
Open Space for
PUBLIC HEALTH
& SAFETY |
Safety Element |
Alquist-Priolo Fault Zones |
| Other Potentially Active Fault Zones |
| Other Seismic Hazard Areas |
| Areas with Slope Instability |
| Flood Hazard Areas |
| Wildland Fire Hazard Areas |
| Other Policies |
| Land-Use Element |
Other Policies |
| Open Space Element |
Other Policies |
Figure OS-2
View full size Figure OS-2
The County shall use the following policies in addition to those in
the Land Use Element to accomplish the above objectives:
OS-1a: Avoid amendments to increase residential density in
community separators, since these densities were established based upon
the policies set forth in other elements of this plan as well as the
open space, separation and visual considerations identified in this
section. The integrity of community separators cannot be maintained
at densities in excess of one unit per ten acres. However, under no
circumstances shall this policy be used to justify an increase in density
from that designated on the land use map.
OS-1b: Avoid commercial or industrial uses in community separators
other than those which are permitted by the agricultural or resource
land use categories, except as may be authorized by policy OS-1c below.
Consider amendments for outdoor recreational or other uses with a low
intensity of structures only in those community separators along the
Highway 101 Corridor.
OS-1c: Notwithstanding policies OS-1a,
OS-1b, LU-5c, the policies of the Agricultural Resources and Public
Facilities Elements, and the densities set forth on the land use map,
the Board of Supervisors may, through a development agreement or other
appropriate mechanism, allow additional or varied development within
community separators on a case by case basis if, at a minimum, the following
criteria are met:
1) permanent open space preservation is provided through open space
grants to the County and/or third party land trust.
2) development is clustered, concentrated or located to maintain the
visual quality of the separator.
3) in addition to providing permanent open space preservation, the development
includes other public benefits which equal or outweigh the impacts of
placing such development within the separator.
4) the development is accompanied by a visual analysis which demonstrates
that the development either is not detrimental to or, in fact, enhances
the visual quality of the separator as a whole.
5) adequate additional public services and infrastructure are available
to serve the development.
6) the development is compatible with surrounding properties, especially
those used for agricultural pursuits.
7) where open space grants are offered by way of easement as opposed
to fee title, the development proposal includes a landscaping and maintenance
plan which retains or enhances the visual integrity of the permanent
open space.
In addition to the mandatory criteria set forth above, special consideration
will be given to projects which incorporate one or more of the following:
1) aggregation of parcels within the separator to achieve a project
design which enhances the separator as a whole.
2) creative developer/city/county financing mechanisms to maintain and
preserve open space or parkland which may be dedicated in fee as part
of the proposed development.
3) project design features which provide for pedestrian or bicycle links
between the communities on either side of the separator and to any parkland
which may be dedicated in fee as part of the proposed development.
Nothing set forth in this policy shall require the Board of Supervisors
to allow this additional development in community separators. Development,
if any, proposed pursuant to this policy may be allowed after public
hearing if the Board, in its sole discretion, determines that the proposed
development is desirable for the community as a whole and is otherwise
consistent with the General Plan and the criteria set forth above.
OS-1d: Apply the Scenic Resources combining district consistent
with this element to all lands located within a community separator.
OS-1e: Require that new structures meet the following criteria:
1) they are sited below exposed ridgelines.
2) they use natural landforms and existing vegetation to screen them
from view from public roads. On exposed sites, screening with native,
fire retardant plants may be required.
3) cuts and fills are discouraged and where practical, driveways are
screened from public view .
4) utilities are undergrounded where economically practical.
Exempt agricultural accessory structures from this policy if their
use does not require a use permit in the zoning ordinance. If compliance
with these standards would make a parcel unbuildable, site structures
where minimum visual impacts would result.
Exempt telecommunication facilities if they meet the siting and design
criteria of the Scenic Resources (SR) Zoning District.
OS-1f: Use the following standards in addition to those of
Policy OS-1e for subdivisions in community separators:
1) establish building envelopes for structures. Consider use of height
limitations if necessary to further mitigate visual impacts.
2) use clustering to reduce visual impact where consistent with the
land use element.
3) locate building sites and roadways to preserve significant existing
tree stands and significant oak trees.
4) to the extent allowed by law, require dedication of a permanent scenic
or agricultural easement at the time of subdivision.
OS-1g: Initiate an implementation program for community separator
areas.
OS-1h: Consider placing on the ballot a measure which would
establish an Open Space District for the purpose of acquiring and administering
open space lands, including an appropriate method of financing.
OS-1i: Consider voluntary transfer of development rights (TDR)
and purchase of development rights (PDR) programs and make community
separators eligible with owner consent.
OS-1j: Until the expiration of Ordinance No. 5111R, the general
plan land use regulations for the lands within the Petaluma/Novato Community
Separator shall not be changed so as to increase either the allowed
intensity or density of development by changing the land use designations
in Figure LU-5h of the Land Use Element without the prior approval of
the voters of Sonoma County. This provision shall also apply to any
general plan that succeeds the 1989 Sonoma County General Plan.
2.2 POLICY FOR SCENIC LANDSCAPE UNITS
Coastal bluffs, vineyards, San Pablo Bay, the Laguna de Santa Rosa and
other landscapes are of special importance to Sonoma County. Preservation
of these scenic resources is important to the quality of life of County
residents and the tourists and agricultural economy. Other features such
as the Mayacamas and Sonoma Mountains provide scenic backdrops to communities.
As the county urbanizes, maintenance of the openness of these areas provides
important visual relief from urban densities. These landscapes have little
capacity to absorb very much development without significant visual impact.
Major scenic landscape units have been identified as follows:
| 1) |
The Coast. The Sonoma coast is a scenic resource vital to
the county. Three basic types of landscapes are included -- the flat
terraces south of the Russian River, the more hilly terraces from
Fort Ross northward, and the cliffs and landslide area between. |
| 2) |
Oat Valley. Oat Valley and the hillsides above it provide
the scenic northern entrance to the county near Cloverdale. |
| 3) |
Alexander and Dry Creek Valleys. Protection of these agricultural
valleys' scenic beauty is not only important from an aesthetic standpoint,
but also from an economic one as agricultural marketing is closely
tied to the area's scenic image. The hills along Highway 101 and above
the valley floor are particularly sensitive. |
| 4) |
Hills east of Windsor. These hills provide a scenic backdrop
to the Santa Rosa Plain. North of Windsor the area extends into the
plain and adjoins the low, rolling hills which form part of the Healdsburg-Windsor
Community Separator. |
| 5) |
Eastside Road. This area of rolling hills is an important
transition between the community of Windsor and the rich agricultural
and mineral resource areas of the Russian River Valley. |
| 6) |
River Road. This area provides a variety of landscapes, including
valleys planted in vineyards, orchard covered hillsides, and redwood
groves adjacent to the Russian River. |
| 7) |
Laguna de Santa Rosa. This area consists primarily of the
scenic lowlands and floodplain around the Laguna de Santa Rosa marsh,
swamp and riparian forest. It also includes hills between Forestville,
Sebastopol and Meacham Hill. It defines the eastern boundary of Sebastopol
and associated rural residential development. |
| 8) |
Bennett Valley. Bennett Mountain forms a scenic backdrop
from Bennett Valley Road. This area defines Santa Rosa's southeastern
boundary and also abuts Annadel State Park. |
| 9) |
Highway 116. The view corridor along Highway 116 contains
unique views of orchards, redwood groves, and the Russian River. This
area also defines the community boundaries of Forestville, Guerneville,
and Monte Rio and their adjacent rural residential development. |
| 10) |
Atascadero Creek. This area consists primarily of the lowlands
and floodplains along Atascadero Creek and the hills along Occidental
Road. The area defines the western boundary of Sebastopol and its
adjacent rural residential development, separates Sebastopol and Graton,
and creates a visual connection to the Laguna de Santa Rosa. |
| 11) |
Coleman Valley. The Coleman Valley Road area contains unique
views of forests, canyons, grazing lands, and the ocean. |
| 12) |
Sonoma Mountains. These are highly valuable scenic lands,
clearly defining the eastern edge of the Santa Rosa plain between
Petaluma and Sonoma. They provide an important backdrop to the urban
valley. |
| 13) |
Hills south of Petaluma. The open grassy hillsides and ridgelines
of the area are extremely sensitive. Located at the Marin County border,
this area serves as a gateway to the county. |
| 14) |
Sonoma Valley. Included in this area are the Sonoma-Napa
Mountains which provide a backdrop to the valley and agricultural
areas bordering the valley. These areas define the boundaries of the
urban and rural communities and are very sensitive because of their
small size and the unobstructed view of them from roads and adjoining
urban areas. |
| 15) |
South Sonoma Mountains. These hillsides are an important
part of the South County landscape with a simple landform, minimal
vegetation, and a clear widespread viewing area. Pasture and forage
lands along the Highway 37 corridor are included to preserve views
of the San Pablo Bay. |
Goal OS-2: Retain the largely open, scenic character of important
scenic landscape units.
Objective OS-2.1: Retain a rural, scenic character in scenic landscape
units with very low intensities of development. Avoid their inclusion
within spheres of influence for public service providers.
Objective OS-2.2: Provide opportunities for consideration of additional
development in scenic landscape units in exchange for permanent open space
preservation.
The following policies in addition to those of the Land Use Element
shall be used to accomplish the above objectives:
OS-2a: Avoid amendments to increase residential density in
scenic landscape units in excess of one unit per ten acres. The land
use plan may designate a lower density or larger minimum lot size.
OS-2b: Avoid commercial or industrial uses in scenic landscape
units other than those which are permitted by the agricultural or resource
land use categories.
OS-2c: Notwithstanding policies OS-2a and
LU-8a and the densities set forth on the land use map, the Board of
Supervisors may, through a development agreement or other appropriate
mechanism, allow additional residential development within scenic landscape
units on a case by case basis if, at a minimum, the following criteria
are met:
| 1) |
Permanent open space preservation is provided through open space
grants to the County and/or third party land trust. |
| 2) |
Development is clustered, concentrated or located to maintain
the visual quality of the area. |
| 3) |
In addition to providing permanent open space preservation, the
development includes other public benefits which equal or outweigh
the impacts of placing such development within the scenic landscape
unit. |
| 4) |
The development is accompanied by a visual analysis which demonstrates
that the development either is not detrimental to or, in fact, enhances
the visual quality of the area. |
| 5) |
Adequate additional public services and infrastructure are available
to serve the development. |
| 6) |
The development is compatible with surrounding properties, especially
those used for agricultural pursuits. |
| 7) |
The development does not require urban level services. |
| 8) |
To the extent possible, the development is consistent with the
policies set forth in the Agricultural Resources Element. |
In addition to the mandatory criteria stated above, special consideration
will be given to projects which incorporate one or more of the following:
| 1) |
aggregation of parcels within the scenic landscape unit to achieve
a project design which visually enhances the area. |
| 2) |
creative developer/city/county financing mechanisms to maintain
and preserve open space or parkland which may be dedicated in fee
as part of the proposed development. |
| 3) |
project design features which provide for pedestrian or bicycle
links to any parkland which may be dedicated in fee as part of the
proposed development. |
Nothing set forth in this policy shall require the Board of Supervisors
to allow this additional development in scenic landscape units. Development,
if any, proposed pursuant to this policy may be allowed after public
hearing if the Board, in its sole discretion, determines that the proposed
development is desirable for the community as a whole and is otherwise
consistent with the General Plan and the criteria set forth above.
OS-2d: Apply the Scenic Resources combining district consistent
with this element to all lands located within scenic landscape units.
OS-2e: Require that new structures meet the following criteria:
| 1) |
they are sited below exposed ridgelines |
| 2) |
they use natural landforms and existing vegetation to screen
them from view from public roads. On exposed sites, screening
with native, fire retardant plants may be required. |
| 3) |
cuts and fills are discouraged and where practical, driveways
are screened from public view. |
| 4) |
utilities are undergrounded where economically practical. |
Exempt agricultural accessory structures from this policy if their
use does not require a use permit in the zoning ordinance. If compliance
with these standards would make a parcel unbuildable, site structures
where minimum visual impacts would result.
Exempt telecommunication facilities if they meet the siting and
design criteria of the Scenic Resources (SR) Zoning District.
OS-2f: Use the following standards in addition to those of
Policy OS-2e for subdivisions in scenic landscape units:
| 1) |
establish building envelopes for structures. Consider use of
height limitations if necessary to further mitigate visual impacts. |
| 2) |
use clustering to reduce visual impact where consistent with
the land use element. |
| 3) |
locate building sites and roadways to preserve significant existing
tree stands and significant oak trees. |
OS-2g: Identify critical scenic areas within designated scenic
landscape units. To the extent allowed by law, consider requiring
dedication of a permanent scenic or agricultural easement at the time
of subdivision for properties within these critical scenic areas.
OS-2h: Consider voluntary transfer of development rights
(TDR) and purchase of development rights (PDR) programs and make scenic
landscape units eligible with owner consent.
OS-2i: For development on parcels located both within scenic
landscape units and adjacent to scenic corridors, apply the more restrictive
siting and setback policies to preserve visual quality.
2.3 POLICY FOR SCENIC CORRIDORS
Many residents of Sonoma County value highly the variety and beauty of
the County's many landscapes as viewed from rural roadways. Motorists
can travel from urban centers into orchard and forest covered hills, rolling
dairy lands, and scenic valleys planted in vineyards. Preserving these
landscapes is important to the character of the county.
Goal OS-3: Identify and preserve roadside landscapes which have a
high visual quality as they contribute to the living environment of local
residents and to the county's tourism economy.
Objective OS-3.1: Designate the scenic corridors on Figures OS-5a
through OS-5i along roadways which cross highly scenic areas, provide
visual links to major recreation areas, give access to historic areas,
or serve as scenic entranceways to cities.
Objective OS-3.2: Provide guidelines so future land uses, development
and roadway construction are compatible with the preservation of scenic
values along designated scenic highway corridors.
The County shall use the following policies to achieve these objectives:
OS-3a: Apply the Scenic Resources combining district to those
portions of properties within scenic corridor setbacks.
OS-3b: For development on parcels located both within scenic
landscape units and adjacent to scenic corridors, apply the more restrictive
siting and setback policies to preserve visual quality.
OS-3c: Establish a rural scenic corridor
setback of 30 percent of the depth of the lot to a maximum of 200
feet from the centerline of the road unless a different setback is
provided in the planning area policies of the Land Use Element. Prohibit
development within the setback with the following exceptions:
| 1) |
New barns and similar agricultural support structures
added to existing farm complexes provided that such structures
proposed within a State Scenic Highway or where local design review
exists by community choice in an adopted specific or area plan
are subject to administrative design review. |
| 2) |
New barns and similar agricultural support structures
which do not require a use permit in the zoning ordinance provided
that such structures proposed within a State Scenic Highway or
where local design review exists by community choice in an adopted
specific or area plan are subject to administrative design review. |
| 3) |
Maintenance, restoration, reconstruction, or minor
expansion of existing structures. |
| 4) |
Telecommunication facilities that meet the applicable
criteria established in the zoning ordinances |
| 5) |
Other new structures if they are subject to design
review and |
| |
a) |
they are associated with existing structures, |
| |
b) |
there is no other reasonable location for the structure, |
| |
c) |
the location within the setback is necessary for
the use, or |
| |
d) |
existing vegetation and topography screen the use. |
| 6) |
Compliance with the setback would render
the parcel unbuildable. |
| 7) |
Satellite dishes which are not visible
from the roadway. |
OS-3d: Establish a building setback of 20 feet along the Highway
101 Scenic Corridor in urban service areas to be reserved for landscaping.
Where a sound barrier must be located along a scenic corridor, ensure
that the landscaped area is visible from the highway. Cooperate with
state agencies to achieve compatible goals with regard to visual quality
along scenic corridors.
OS-3e: Incorporate design criteria for scenic corridors in
urban areas.
OS-3f: Refer building permits within the setback along historic
Bohemian Highway between Occidental and Freestone and Bodega Highway
between Bodega and Freestone to the Sonoma County Landmarks Commission
for review and recommendations.
OS-3g: Avoid freeway oriented billboards along designated
scenic corridors. Establish design criteria for consideration of new
freestanding outdoor advertising structures or signs along designated
scenic corridors to retain visual quality. Consider amortization of
existing signs subject to the limitations of state law as a condition
of approval for discretionary permits.
OS-3h: Design public works projects to minimize tree damage
and removal along scenic corridors. Where trees must be removed, design
replanting programs so as to accommodate ultimate planned highway
improvements. Require revegetation following grading and road cuts.
OS-3i: Recognize Highway 116 from Highway 1 to the southern
edge of Sebastopol as an official state scenic highway. Consider requesting
official state scenic highway designations for Highways 1 and 37.
Upon the request of local residents, the County may pursue similar
state status for other scenic corridors.
OS-3j: Consider the Bodega Bay Bypass as a scenic corridor
upon completion of construction.
3.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES
Sonoma County is rich in plant and animal habitats which warrant protection.
Primary components mapped on the open space plan maps are critical habitat
areas and riparian corridors. Figure OS-3 on page
185 shows these areas.
3.1 POLICY FOR CRITICAL HABITAT AREAS
Certain biotic resource communities provide wildlife habitat and contribute
to the quality of life in Sonoma County. These critical habitat areas
are designated on Figure OS-3 on page --- and require
special protection because they are highly sensitive to change and could
be adversely affected by development.
Important critical habitat areas include:
| 1) |
Wetlands and Marshes - These are identified as critical habitats
and may include, but are not limited to, tidal salt marshes and estuaries,
freshwater marshes such as the Pitkin, Petaluma and Kenwood marshes,
and vernal pools. Wetlands provide a habitat for many animal and plant
species and serve as the base of a food chain which supports many
types of fish, waterfowl and other birds and mammals. Loss of wetlands
affects these species and decreases hunting, fishing, and recreational
opportunities. |
| 2) |
Other Critical Habitats - Remnants of native bunchgrasses
and oak savannas represent the original vegetation of Sonoma County.
Sargent Cypress Forests, Pygmy Forests, and Coastal Dunes contain
rare and endangered species, are easily damaged and are difficult
to reestablish. These areas may include but are not limited to preserves
of the Sonoma County Land Trust, Audubon Society, Academy of Science,
Nature Conservancy and Bouverie. |
Goal OS-4: Identify critical habitat areas and assure that the quality
of these natural resources is maintained and not adversely affected by
development activities.
Objective OS-4.1: Designate important wetlands, marshes and other
critical habitats and maintain low intensity land uses in these areas.
Objective OS-4.2: Establish development guidelines to protect
designated critical habitat areas.
The County shall use the following policies to achieve these objectives:
OS-4a: Add a Biotic Resources combining district to the zoning
ordinance.
OS-4b: Rezone to the Biotic Resources combining district any
lands designated as a critical habitat area.
OS-4c: Require the preparation of a biotic resource assessment
to develop mitigation measures if the Planning Director determines that
a discretionary project could adversely impact a designated critical
habitat area.
OS-4d: Establish building envelopes to avoid designated critical
habitat areas on tentative maps.
OS-4e: Require on building permits a minimum setback of 50
feet from the edge of any wetlands which are within a critical habitat
area. Exempt existing farm buildings and allow them to be expanded or
modified.
OS-4f: Consider waiver of the setback if, after preparation
of a biotic resource assessment, it is determined that applying the
setback makes the parcel unbuildable or the structure is a noncommercial
agricultural building and must be located adjacent to an existing farm
complex for efficient farm operation.
OS-4g: Consider voluntary transfer of development rights (TDR)
and purchase of development rights (PDR) programs and make critical
habitat areas eligible with owner consent.
3.2 POLICY FOR RIPARIAN CORRIDORS
Areas along streams with native vegetation are referred to as riparian
corridors. Diverse vegetation and the streamside environment offer insect
and plant food, shelter, and nesting sites and provide a water source
for birds, fish, and mammals. The plant cover regulates water, temperature
and provides a nursery habitat for trout, salmon, steelhead, and other
fish.
Riparian vegetation contributes to both water quantity and quality. Plants
and trees serve as filters for sediment, pesticides, and fertilizers.
They stabilize banks and keep soils loose and permeable, allowing aquifers
along streams to be recharged. Elimination of natural plant communities
along streams can increase surface run-off and siltation, which, in turn,
can create a stream environment detrimental to fisheries. Riparian corridors
are therefore an important part of open space.
Riparian areas can create conflicts with agricultural and urban uses.
Overgrazing can remove vegetative cover. Lands along streams often contain
prime cropland soils. Riparian areas can harbor insect pests and plant
diseases which may infect adjacent vineyards and orchards.
Goal OS-5: Provide protective measures for riparian corridors along
selected streams which balance the need for agricultural production, urban
development, timber and mining operations, and flood control with preservation
of riparian values.
Objective OS-5.1: Classify important streams with native vegetation
as "riparian corridors". Develop guidelines to protect and manage these
areas as valuable resources.
The County shall use the following policies to achieve the above objective:
OS-5a: Classify riparian corridors designated in the open space
element as follows:
| 1) |
"Urban Riparian Corridors" include those portions of designated
corridors within urban residential, commercial, industrial, or public/quasi-public
land use categories. |
| 2) |
"Russian River Riparian Corridor" includes the corridor adjacent
to any part of the Russian River which is neither located within
the above urban riparian corridor nor within the jurisdiction
of a city. |
| 3) |
"Flatland Riparian Corridors" include the corridors adjacent to
any streams which flow through predominantly flat or very gently
sloping land, generally with alluvial soil. This classification
excludes areas covered by 1) and 2) above. |
| 4) |
"Upland Riparian Corridors" include the corridors adjacent to
streams not included in the above three categories. |
OS-5b: Rezone to the Biotic Resources combining district any
lands designated as riparian corridors.
OS-5c: Establish streamside conservation areas, measured from
the top of the higher bank as determined by the SCWA, for designated
riparian corridors as follows:
1) Urban Riparian Corridors: 50'
2) Russian River Riparian Corridor: 200'
3) Flatland Riparian Corridors: 100'
4) Upland Riparian Corridors: 50'
OS-5d: Designate additional riparian corridors in specific
plans, area plans, or local area development guidelines which will be
subject to policies included therein.
OS-5e: Allow or consider allowing the following
uses within any streamside conservation area:
| 1) |
Timber operations conducted in accordance with an
approved timber harvest plan. |
| 2) |
Streamside maintenance. |
| 3) |
Road crossings and street crossings, utility line
crossings. |
| 4) |
Mining operations conducted in accordance with the
County Surface Mining and Reclamation Ordinance. |
| 5) |
Permitted summer dams. |
| 6) |
Grazing and similar agricultural production activities
not involving structures or cultivation, except as defined by 7)
below. |
| 7) |
Agricultural cultivation: |
| |
a) |
located no closer than 100' from the top of the bank in the "Russian
River Riparian Corridor". |
| |
b) |
located no closer than 50' from the top of the bank in "flatland
riparian corridors". |
| |
c) |
located no closer than 25' from the top of the bank in "upland
riparian corridors". |
| |
d) |
The setbacks of 7 a), b), and c) above may be reduced through
the discretionary approval process or through a plan approved by
the Planning Director provided the owner includes appropriate mitigations
for potential erosion, bank stabilization and biotic impacts. |
| 8) |
Vegetation removal as part of an integrated pest management
program administered by the Agricultural Commissioner. |
| 9) |
Creekside bikeways, trails and parks within urban
riparian corridors. |
| 10) |
Development authorized by waiver under OS-5f. |
OS-5f: Prohibit, except as allowed by OS-5e,
structures, roads and utility lines and parking lots within any streamside
conservation area. Consider waiver of this prohibition if:
1) it makes a lot unbuildable and vegetation removal is minimized,
2) no significant disturbance of riparian habitat would occur, or
3) the use involves only the maintenance, restoration or minor expansion
of an existing structure.
A biotic resource assessment may be required prior to issuance of
a waiver.
OS-5g: Review timber harvest plans adjacent to designated riparian
corridors and request that clear cutting not occur within streamside
conservation areas. Where clear cutting is approved by the applicable
state or federal agency along designated riparian corridors, ensure
that at least 50 percent of the overstory canopy and at least 50 percent
of the understory vegetation be retained.
OS-5h: Use the following criteria to determine whether or not
public projects are consistent with this element:
| 1) |
Non-emergency Water Agency projects which include significant
streambank modification are not consistent. Refer plans for vegetation
removal for maintenance purposes to the Department of Fish and Game
(DFG) for review. |
| 2) |
Roadway and utility construction should seek to minimize and mitigate,
where feasible, damage to riparian areas. Minimize vegetation removal
for necessary stream crossings. |
| 3) |
All criteria established in policy OS-5f. |
| 4) |
Grading, filling or construction shall not substantially diminish
or divert any stream flow or result in any substantial increase
in bank instability or erosion. |
In the event that the above criteria cannot be met, a public project
may be found consistent with this element if there is an overriding
net public benefit.
OS-5i: Refer discretionary permits along undesignated streams
to the SCWA and the DFG as part of the environmental review process.
4.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION
Open space for outdoor recreation, including parks, equestrian and hiking
trails, and bicycle routes, provides pleasure and enjoyment for County
residents. The Public Facilities and Services Element contains a detailed
analysis of parkland needs and implementation measures. Figures OS-4a
and 4b on pages 187 and 189 show designated outdoor
recreation areas.
4.1 POLICY FOR PARKS AND EQUESTRIAN AND HIKING TRAILS
As of 1986, hiking and riding trails were primarily confined to parklands
and to Coastal access trails within the Sea Ranch Subdivision. A trail
system plan developed by the Sonoma County Regional Parks Department links
various parks and expands hiking and riding opportunities. The trail plan
is not a trail users guide but a plan for securing lands for a countywide
trail system. Many property owners, especially those engaged in agriculture,
are concerned about trespassing, liability, and damage if hikers release
farm animals or bring unleashed dogs. Funding the acquisition and maintenance
of trails is also an issue.
Goal OS-7 Establish a countywide park and trail system which
meets future recreational needs of the county's residents while protecting
agricultural uses. The emphasis of the trail system should be near urban
areas and on public lands.
Objective OS-7.1: Provide for adequate parklands and trails primarily
in locations that are convenient to urban areas to meet the outdoor recreation
needs of the population, while not affecting agricultural uses.
The County shall use the following policies to achieve this objective:
OS-7a: Apply the "Public-Quasi Public/Park" designation to
all existing local, county, and state parklands.
OS-7b: Apply the "Park" designation to indicate general areas
where a need exists for parks.
OS-7c: Consider requiring dedication of public access by fee
or easement from a public roadway to a navigable stream (Subdivision
Map Act), the ocean, public lakes, and major reservoirs as a condition
of approval for major subdivisions if 1) the project blocks an existing
public access point or it results in the need for additional access,
and 2) other reasonable access is not available.
OS-7d: The trails on Figure OS-4a on
page 185 make up the County's designated plan for trails. Trail locations
are approximate and are described below. Roadways may be used where
access cannot be obtained through private property.
| 1. |
Gualala River Waterway Trail. The Gualala River is a navigable
waterway and as such, public access is protected by Article XV,
Section 2 of the California Constitution. The trail follows the
river from the Sonoma/Mendocino county line to Stewart's Point Road. |
| 2. |
Sonoma Coast Trail. The proposed trail extends from Black
Point southward to the Estero Americana, is consistent with California
State Coastal Plan policy 145 which calls for establishment of a
coastal trail system statewide. |
| 3. |
Russian River Waterway Trail. The Russian River is a navigable
waterway from Cloverdale to the coast and as such, public access
is protected by Article XV, Section 2 of the California Constitution.
This proposed waterway trail extends from the coast to Preston Bridge
immediately north of Cloverdale. |
| 4. |
Santa Rosa Creek Trail. The proposed Santa Rosa Creek Trail
is located between Guerneville Road and Highway 101 and is owned
in fee by the SCWA. |
| 5. |
Santa Rosa - Forestville Trail. The proposed trail primarily
follows the abandoned right-of-way of the Petaluma and Santa Rosa
Railroad from Highway 101 to Forestville at Highway 116. |
| 6. |
Gossage and Hinebaugh Creek Trail. The proposed trail follows
a SCWA channel between Llano Road and Petaluma Hill Road. The trail
further extends southward to the intersection of Stony Point Road
and Highway 116. It is owned in fee by the Agency. |
| 7. |
Copeland Creek Trail. The proposed trail follows Copeland
Creek and links Rohnert Park near Sonoma State University to Crane
Creek Regional Park. |
| 8. |
Taylor Mountain Trail. The proposed trail connects the
proposed Taylor Mountain County Park with Annadel State Park. |
| 9. |
Stevenson Trail. The proposed trail was proposed by the
California State Department of Parks and Recreation in 1958 to connect
Robert Louis Stevenson Park and the Napa Valley. |
| 10. |
Hood Mountain Trail North. The proposed trail links Hood
Mountain County Park to a 240-acre Bureau of Land Management holding
to the east at the Sonoma/Napa county line. |
| 11. |
Hood Mountain - Annadel Trail. The proposed trail links
Hood Mountain County Park to Annadel State Park, however a crossing
at Highway 12 will be necessary to obtain. |
| 12. |
Valley of the Moon Trail. The proposed trail traverses
the Valley of the Moon between Jack London State Park and the Sonoma/Napa
county line and links Sonoma Valley Regional Park to the Glen Ellen
community. |
| 13. |
Sonoma Trail. The proposed trail follows the right-of-way
of the Northwestern Railroad from the City of Sonoma to Highway
121/12. |
| 14. |
Petaluma River Waterway Trail. The Petaluma River is a
navigable waterway and as such, public access is protected by Article
XV, Section 2 of the California Constitution. The proposed trail
extends from Shollenberger River Park to San Pablo Bay. |
Classify potential trails as follows:
| 1) |
Recreational Waterways: Recognize boating and canoeing
activities on designated waterways. Limit hiking trails to connections
between urban areas, parks and the waterway. |
| 2) |
Hiking and Equestrian Trails: Locate a trail system along
the Sonoma County/Napa County boundary. Link existing and proposed
state and county parks adjacent to urban areas. |
| 3) |
Multiple Use Trails: Use railroad rights-of-way and water
agency channels as multiple use trails for hiking, equestrian and
bike use. Use existing roadways as alternative routes if access
cannot be obtained. |
OS-7e: Encourage private organizations to assist in the construction
and maintenance of trails.
OS-7f: Consider requiring a dedication in fee or by easement
for trails as a condition of approval of subdivisions. There must be
a need identified on Figures OS-4a or OS-4b
on pages 185 and 187 and the project must either block an existing access
or result in the need for additional recreational opportunities. Locate
and fence trails to minimize impacts on agricultural uses.
OS-7g: Use the following guidelines to determine consistency
of projects involving lands with abandoned railroad rights of way where
reasonably related to the impacts of the project:
| 1) |
The project does not or will not preclude the use of the right-of-way
for trails. |
| 2) |
A width of 60 feet generally is reserved for trail purposes, unless
the Regional Parks Department determines that a different width
would be adequate. |
| 3) |
An irrevocable offer of dedication for the right-of-way has been
made to the County of Sonoma. |
OS-7h: Identify and evaluate alternative sites in the Boyes
Hot Springs area to meet the projected need for a regional park facility
in Sonoma Valley.
4.2 POLICY FOR BIKEWAYS
Bicycles are used both for daily transportation and for recreation. At
present, however, the bicycle must compete with the automobile for roadway
space. The lack of an adequate bikeways system discourages their use.
There are three types of bikeways:
| 1) |
Class I Bikeway is a bike path for the exclusive use of bicycles.
It is separated from the road by space or a barrier. A bike path may
be on part of a road right-of-way or on a separate right-of-way. |
| 2) |
Class II Bikeway is a bike lane on a right-of-way for the
primary use of bicycles. Through travel by autos or pedestrians is
not allowed, although vehicle parking is permissible. |
| 3) |
Class III Bikeway is a bike route which shares its right-of-way
with either moving autos or pedestrians. |
State bicycle touring routes in Sonoma County include Highway 1, Highway
116, Highway 128, and a north/south route including "D" Street in Petaluma,
Petaluma Hill Road, Old Redwood Highway, Dry Creek Road, and Dutcher Creek.
Goal OS-8: Establish a Bikeways Network that provides a safe and supportive
environment for bicyclists in Sonoma County, recognizing that bicycling
is a viable mode of transportation and popular form of recreation.
Objective OS-8.1: Design, construct and maintain a comprehensive
Bikeways Network that links the County's cities, unincorporated communities,
and other major activity centers including schools, recreational areas
and employment centers.
Objective OS-8.2: Encourage large businesses and all governmental
agencies to facilitate commuting by bicycle and ensure that future development
in unincorporated areas facilitates the use of bicycles for transportation.
Objective OS-8.3: Increase public awareness of the rights and
responsibilities of bicyclists and the benefits of bicycling as a mode
of transportation and form of recreation.
The County shall use the following policies to achieve these objectives:
OS-8a: Use the adopted Sonoma County Bikeways Plan as the detailed
planning document for existing and proposed bikeways.
OS-8b: Secure funding for the design and construction of the
Bikeways Network from federal, state, and local resources, and any other
available public or private funding sources.
OS-8c: Designate the Regional Parks Department as the agency
responsible for establishing and maintaining Class I bikeways along
public rights-of-way in unincorporated areas, and the Transportation
and Public Works Department as the agency responsible for establishing
and maintaining Class II and III bikeways along public rights-of-way
in unincorporated areas.
OS-8d: In designing bicycle facilities in the unincorporated
areas, the Transportation and Public Works Department and the Regional
Parks Department shall adhere to the design provisions outlined in the
"Bikeways Planning and Design" chapter of the Caltrans Highway Design
Manual.
OS-8e: On roads designated as Class III bikeways with "future
shoulders," shoulders less than four feet wide should be provided as
long as significant grading, removal of tress, or adverse effects on
existing structures, driveways or drainage would not result.
OS-8f: Ensure the provision of adequate bikeways while preserving
visual quality along scenic corridors.
OS-8g: Make every effort to provide minimum 4-foot wide bicycle
lanes on all roads designated as Class II bikeways in the Bikeways Network.
When traffic markings on roads are modified, existing minimum 4-foot
wide lanes should be maintained wherever feasible. Where it is infeasible
for minimum 4-foot wide lanes, use striped edgelines or other techniques
to provide the widest possible lane for bicyclists.
OS-8h: Where feasible, avoid parking on designated Class II
bikeways unless the removal of parking adversely affects adjacent property
owners.
OS-8i: Wherever possible, upgrade existing traffic signals
on County roadways so the most sensitive spot on signal detector loops
identifies and is adjusted to detect bicycles. Design and adjust all
new traffic signal detector loops installed on County roads to detect
bicycles.
OS-8j: To the extent feasible, minimize the number of road
intersections on Class I bikeways to provide safe crossings for bicyclists
at access points.
OS-8k: Whenever opportunities for acquisition arise, review
the status of abandoned railroad rights-of-way, natural waterways, flood
control rights-of-way and public lands for potential designation as
new Class I bikeways. Review railroad rights-of-way proposed for transit
use for potential multiple use as Class I bikeways.
OS-8l: Review the design of all new road widening projects
in order to minimize, to the extent feasible, hazards and barriers to
bicycle travel on all County roads.
OS-8m: To the extent permitted by maintenance funding, provide
for the routine maintenance of designated Bikeways, including patching
and/or sweeping of paved shoulders where gravel, glass or other debris
has accumulated, and trimming of foliage where it encroaches into the
paved shoulder.
OS-8n: Consider centerline striping and signs, indicating the
separation of opposing directions of travel in the design of Class I
Bikeways to ensure the safety of bicyclists and other users of Class
I Bikeways and multiuse trails.
OS-8o: Encourage the dedication of Class I bikeways as part
of open space requirements for development, when a nexus can be established
between the proposed development and the need for bikeways in the affected
area.
OS-8p: To the extent feasible, where different classes of bikeways
share the same route, Class 1 bikeways should not be constructed in
a manner that reduces or eliminates designated bikeways without consultation
with the Bicycle Advisory Committee.
Figure OS-3
View full size Figure OS-3
Figure OS-4a
View full size Figure OS-4a
Figure OS-4b
View full size Figure OS-4b
OS-8q: Use the following criteria to determine consistency of
public and private projects with this element:
| 1) |
Development of lands traversed or adjoined by a designated
Class I bikeway accommodates, and does not conflict, with development
of the bikeway. |
| 2) |
Construction or widening of roads designated for Class II bikeways
meets the criteria for Class II bikeways specified in the Bikeways
Plan. |
| 3) |
Construction or widening of roads designated for Class III bikeways
meets the criteria for Class III bikeways specified in the Bikeways
Plan. |
In the event that a project proposed without inclusion of a bikeway
has a significant, overriding public benefit, or no funds are available
for bikeway construction, the project may be found consistent with this
Element and the Bikeways Plan if it does not preclude future construction
of a bikeway and makes the best feasible pfovision for interim bicycle
travel.
OS-8r: Continue to promote flex-time work schedules for all
County employees to encourage non-rush hour bicycle commuting and dispersal
of rush hour motor vehicle traffic.
OS-8s: Consider amending County regulations to provide for
more flexible parking, circulation and other design standards for:
| 1) |
Projects that incorporate higher density mixed land uses which
allow the bicycle to be an effective alternative mode of transportation
to the automobile. |
| 2) |
New industrial, office, institutional and commercial projects
which provide employee showers and locker rooms. |
OS-8t: To the extent feasible, provide male and female shower
and locker facilities and adequate bicycle parking at the County Administration
Center and other County facilities.
OS-8u: To the extent that agency budgets allow, the County
Bicycle Advisory Committee shall take advantage of every opportunity
to:
| 1) |
Work with the Transportation and Public Works Department, the
Regional Parks Department and other appropriate agencies to ensure
that the Bikeways Network is constructed. When road segments are
proposed for overlay or rehabilitation, the Department of Transportation
and Public Works shall work with the Committee to encourage inclusion
of bikeway improvements, to the maximum extent feasible given the
design and width of the road and the status of agency budgets. |
| 2) |
Work with appropriate agencies to implement a public awareness
program aimed at motorists and bicyclists which educates each on
the rights and responsibilities of bicyclists. This program shall
include preparation of materials that educate bicyclists on safe
riding habits. |
| 3) |
Educate the general public and the officials of state, county,
and local law enforcement agencies on common Vehicle Code infractions
involving bicyclists. |
| 4) |
Coordinate Bicycle Safety Education Programs among schools, law
enforcement agencies and other appropriate groups. The program shall
stress bicycle handling skills, traffic rules, the importance of
good helmets, lights and reflectors, reflective bicycling clothing,
and bicycle maintenance courses in cooperation with local bicycle
shops and organizations. |
OS-8v: Department of Transportation and Public Works shall continue
to review accidents involving bicycles in unincorporated areas. The
Department of Transportation and Public Works and the Bicycle Advisory
Committee shall review this data annually to identify problem areas
which require immediate attention.
5.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Historic preservation is intended to maintain reminders of the County's
heritage and development. Historic building surveys for the Coastal, Sebastopol,
Healdsburg, and Sonoma Valley areas provide an inventory of the county's
historic resources, some of which may be threatened by development or
by a lack of maintenance. Archaeological sites provide information on
the history and culture of Sonoma County's earliest residents and can
be disturbed by development activities. Heritage and landmark trees enhance
the quality of the environment and have historical significance.
Goal OS-9 Preserve significant archaeological and historical sites
which represent the ethnic, cultural, and economic groups that have lived
and worked in Sonoma County. Preserve unique or historically significant
heritage or landmark trees.
Objective OS-9.1: Encourage the preservation and conservation
of historic structures by promoting their rehabilitation or adaptation
to new uses.
Objective OS-9.2: Encourage preservation of historic building
or cemeteries by maintaining a Landmarks Commission to review projects
which may affect historic structures or other cultural resources.
Objective OS-9.3: Encourage preservation of archaeological resources
by reviewing all development projects in archaeologically sensitive areas.
Objective OS-9.4: Identify and preserve heritage and landmark
trees.
The County shall use the following policies to achieve these objectives:
OS-9a: Designate the County Landmarks Commission to review
projects within designated historic districts.
OS-9b: Refer proposals for County Landmark status and rezonings
to the Historic Combining District to the County Landmarks Commission.
OS-9c: The County Landmarks Commission shall review Historic
Building Surveys and make recommendations for designation of structures
or cemeteries as county landmarks.
OS-9d: Include a list of historic structures proposed for designation
as county landmarks in specific or area plans or local area development
guidelines and refer the list to the Landmarks Commission for their
recommendations.
OS-9e: Refer applications which involve the removal, destruction
or alteration of a structure or cemetery identified in a historic building
survey to the Landmarks Commission for mitigation. Measures may include
reuse, relocation, or photo-documentation.
OS-9f: Refer applications for discretionary permits to the
Northwest Information Center to determine if the project site might
contain archaeological or historical resources. If a site is likely
to have these resources, require a field survey and include mitigation
measures if needed. Discourage paving over resources.
OS-9g: Use the Heritage or Landmark Tree Ordinance and the
design review process to protect trees.
OS-9h: Pursue grant funding for the preparation and updating
of historic resource inventories.
OS-9i: Designate the County Landmarks Commission to administer
a preservation program for stabilization, rehabilitation, and restoration
of historic structures.
6.0 OPEN SPACE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM:
Open Space Program 1: Open Space Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Program Description: Prepare a Scenic Resources combining district,
a Biotic Resources combining district, an amendment to the sign regulations
to prohibit off-site advertising signs in designated scenic corridors,
an amendment to regulate the placement of satellite dishes along scenic
corridors, and a revision of parking regulations to provide bicycle parking
spaces.
Open Space Program 2: Subdivision Ordinance Amendment to Establish
Open
Space Siting Requirements
Program Description: Prepare an ordinance amendment which would
require building envelopes in community separators and scenic landscape
units and building setbacks for scenic corridors, riparian areas and critical
habitat areas.
Open Space Program 3: Request State Scenic Highway Designations for
Highway
1 and Highway 37
Program Description: Adopt a resolution requesting a state study
and appointment of citizens committee which includes representation from
property owners along the corridor. The final scenic highway report will
be sent to the Board and the State for approval.
Open Space Program 4: Establishment of an Open Space District
Program Description: Consider a ballot measure to establish an
Open Space District to acquire and administer open space lands. Include
an appropriate funding source, such as a special tax, to finance acquisition
of partial or in-fee interests in lands, including purchase of development
rights on a voluntary basis, in designated open space areas.
Open Space Program 5: Acquisition of Lands for Trails
Program Description: The Regional Parks Department shall continue
to include in its five-year capital improvement program any proposed county
acquisition or development of lands for trails.
Open Space Program 6: Community Separator Implementation Plan
Program Description: Prepare a plan which evaluates each of the
eight community separators and establishes guidelines and implementation
tools such as 1) transfer or purchase of development rights programs,
2) establishment of incentives to encourage agricultural uses, 3) wastewater
spray irrigation programs, 4) purchase for parks or agriculture and 5)
sign and landscaping standards. The plan should be coordinated with cities
to achieve uniform city/county policies and to provide funding mechanisms.
Open Space Program 7: Scenic Landscape Unit Visual Study
Program Description: Prepare a visual study of designated scenic
landscape units to identify critical scenic areas within these areas.
Include mechanisms for long term management and preservation of scenic
values, such as easements, within critical scenic areas.
Open Space Program 8: Boyes Hot Springs Regional Park Study
Program Description: The Regional Parks Department shall prepare
a study of alternative sites in the Boyes Hot Springs area of Sonoma Valley
to identify an appropriate location for an approximate 38-acre regional
park.
|